Response to "Classroom Audio Podcasting" by Wes Fryer

In this online article, Fryer describes the benefits of using Podcasting in the classroom. In my opinion, one of his most compelling arguments is that it:

"can provide a virtual 'window' into schools, permitting a variety of interested stakeholders to gain an in-depth understanding of the issues students are studying, the new things they are learning, and the evidences of learning (student projects) they are creating as a result of their work both at home and at school."

The ICC is requiring all teachers to be accountable for ensuring that all students are receiving a quality education, complete with skills they will need in the 21st Century. In some of our earlier library classes, we've talked about the importance of performative statements in our field--it's crucial that we let other teachers, administration, and community members the sorts of skills we are teaching directly and indirectly in the library. Using podcasting with students would be an excellent way to make what we do explicit. It would also demonstrate collaboration between the school librarian and the classroom teacher.

Fryer mentions that podcasting is a bit more secure, in terms of internet safety. Students' voices are heard, but they don't have to display their photos, or reveal their names. From a safety standpoint, that makes podcasting an appealing option. I think it's important for parents to know what kinds of technology students are using at school, not only to get their permission, but to show what kinds of skills we are teaching students.

Another argument Fryer makes is that podcasting is a "no frills" technology, unlike imovie, where students can adjust camera angles, colors, etc. For me, it certainly doesn't feel "no frills" yet! Because I'm so new at this, it feels a little complicated! But I know with practice, I will feel confident teaching students who don't have experience with podcasting--and chances are, their learning speed will be much faster than mine!